jimmy/postgrest
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

chore: put ai policy first in CONTRIBUTING

Browse Source 
Otherwise it's not that visible.
This commit is contained in:
steve-chavez
2026-03-23 10:10:58 -05:00
parent 5e504a77fa
commit effcc080e5
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
CONTRIBUTING.md
+8 -8
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
# Contributing to PostgREST
## AI Policy
We adhere to [Gentoo's AI policy](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/AI_policy):
> It is expressly forbidden to contribute [...] any content that has been created with the assistance of Natural Language Processing artificial intelligence tools. This motion can be revisited, should a case been made over such a tool that does not pose copyright, ethical and quality concerns.
You can find more about its rationale [here](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/AI_policy#Rationale).
## Issues
For questions on how to use PostgREST, please use
@@ -52,11 +60,3 @@ To simplify reviews, make it easy to split pull requests if deemed necessary, an
* Tests, documentation, and changelog updates should be contained in the same commits as the actual code changes they relate to. An exception to this rule is when test or documentation changes are made in separate PR.
* Commit messages must be prefixed with one of the prefixes defined in [the list used by commit verification scripts](https://github.com/PostgREST/postgrest/blob/main/nix/tools/gitTools.nix#L11).
* Commit messages should contain a longer description of the purpose of the changes contained in the commit and, for non-trivial changes, a description of the changes themselves.
## AI Policy
We adhere to [Gentoo's AI policy](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/AI_policy):
> It is expressly forbidden to contribute [...] any content that has been created with the assistance of Natural Language Processing artificial intelligence tools. This motion can be revisited, should a case been made over such a tool that does not pose copyright, ethical and quality concerns.
You can find more about its rationale [here](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/AI_policy#Rationale).