test: add big schema openapi test
The io test is marked as pending for now, because the stack size it requires is too big.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Steve Chavez
parent
f4e171aa2b
commit
057e8d63bf
+11321
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
|
||||
\ir big_schema.sql
|
||||
\ir db_config.sql
|
||||
|
||||
set search_path to public;
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE ROLE postgrest_test_anonymous;
|
||||
ALTER ROLE :USER SET pgrst.db_anon_role = 'postgrest_test_anonymous';
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+21
-1
@@ -658,7 +658,9 @@ def test_db_schema_reload(tmp_path, defaultenv):
|
||||
# reload schema cache to verify that the config reload actually happened
|
||||
postgrest.process.send_signal(signal.SIGUSR1)
|
||||
|
||||
time.sleep(0.1)
|
||||
# takes max 1 second to load the internal cache(big_schema.sql included now)
|
||||
# TODO this could go back to time.sleep(0.1) if the big_schema is put in another test suite
|
||||
time.sleep(1)
|
||||
|
||||
response = postgrest.session.get("/rpc/get_guc_value?name=search_path")
|
||||
assert response.text == '"v1, public"'
|
||||
@@ -939,3 +941,21 @@ def test_log_level(level, has_output, defaultenv):
|
||||
r'unknownSocket - - \[.+\] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 500 - "" "python-requests/.+"',
|
||||
postgrest.process.stdout.readline().decode(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: This test fails now because of https://github.com/PostgREST/postgrest/pull/2122
|
||||
# The stack size of 1K(-with-rtsopts=-K1K) is not enough and this fails with "stack overflow"
|
||||
# A stack size of 200K seems to be enough for succeess
|
||||
@pytest.mark.skip
|
||||
def test_openapi_in_big_schema(defaultenv):
|
||||
"Should get a successful response from openapi on a big schema"
|
||||
|
||||
env = {
|
||||
**defaultenv,
|
||||
"PGRST_DB_SCHEMAS": "apflora",
|
||||
"PGRST_OPENAPI_MODE": "ignore-privileges",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
with run(env=env) as postgrest:
|
||||
response = postgrest.session.get("/")
|
||||
assert response.status_code == 200
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user